The American Civil Liberties Union has obstructed the constitutionally guaranteed free exercise of religion of American Christians for nearly a century. One of the ACLU’s first major cases was the infamous Snopes monkey trial, and the organization’s beginning in fighting Christian freedom has persisted throughout its existence. Today, the ACLU argues that a Colorado cake shop should be required by law to violate his religious beliefs by contributing to a gay wedding.
In 2012, Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips was approached by Charlie Craig and David Mullins to design a cake for their same-sex wedding. Due to his Christian beliefs, Phillips informed the men that he does not participate in same-sex weddings. He considered this decision to be a constitutionally-protected act, as his designs are an expression of his free speech, and his religious practice is a free exercise of religion. Phillips is very clear that his decision is not an issue of discriminatory sales. He is more than happy to sell to his products to members of the LGBT community, going so far as to specifically offer any product in his shop to Mr. Craig and Mr. Mullins. He is, however, unwilling to contribute to a ceremony which violates his conscience.
Craig and Mullins responded to Phillips’ refusal by filing a discrimination complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights commission in September of 2012. Months later, in May of 2013, the commission filed suit against Masterpiece Cakeshop and Phillips. The commission concluded that the shop had run afoul of Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act and had discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation, despite Phillips’ offer to do other business with the couple. This ruling also contradicted judicial precedent – the same commission had previously ruled that a baker could not be compelled to make a cake that contained an anti-gay message.
In order to avoid racking up additional fines from the Commission, which had already reached six figures, Phillips stopped creating custom wedding cakes altogether. This segment previously constituted nearly 40% of his business. Fortunately, Masterpiece Cakeshop still has one more chance, as the Supreme Court will hold oral arguments for the case on December 5th. Stay tuned for additional coverage of the arguments at that time.
“It is up to all of us to evangelize our fellow Americans about the issue of religious freedom.” – Justice Samuel Alito
(Madison, NJ) — [LifeSiteNews] The United States’ commitment to religious liberty is being tested and hostility toward traditional moral beliefs is on the rise, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito told a group of Catholic lawyers Wednesday night. (Photo Credit: Flickr)
Justice Alito repeated the words he had written in his own dissent in the Obergefell case legalizing homosexual “marriage,” telling the group that he suspected the decision would be used to “vilify those who disagree and treat them as bigots.”
“We are seeing this is coming to pass,” Alito said.
He then referenced a famed Bob Dylan song lyric, “You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.”
“A wind is picking up that is hostile to those with traditional moral beliefs,” Alito said.
He told the audience that while religious freedom has been recognized in Congress and in the courts, attitudes are not so quick to change.
The Supreme Court Justice described how a Democratic lawmaker opposed his 2005 nomination because Alito would make “too many Catholics on the court.” (Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons)
Alito also called on Americans to raise awareness of threats to religious freedom in the wake of Supreme Court rulings such as the Hobby Lobby case, where the company’s Christian owners objected to being forced to provide contraception in violation of their religious beliefs.
“We are likely to see pitched battles in courts and Congress, state legislatures and town halls,” he said. “But the most important fight is for the hearts and minds of our fellow Americans. It is up to all of us to evangelize our fellow Americans about the issue of religious freedom.”
Alito’s appearance was sponsored by Advocati Christi — or Advocates of Christ. The initiative is part of the Diocese of Paterson, New Jersey’s Catholic Center for Evangelization. It offers outreach to Catholic lawyers and judges to “deepen their practice of the profession of faith, and integrate it into their daily life and practice.”
Alito spoke for about 45 minutes, according to an AP report.
He talked about the hostility faced by Catholics in the U.S. in previous centuries and his joy while staying up overnight as a Catholic youth in 1960 to witness John F. Kennedy’s election as the first Roman Catholic president.
“I felt it had lifted me up from the status of second-class American,” Alito recalled.
While dissenting from the majority in the Obergefell decision in 2015, Justice Alito was alone in saying that marriage existed for the sake of procreation and child-rearing. He wrote that the majority opinion was based on ideas of romantic love.
He had also expressed a concern shared by the other conservative dissenting justices that the Obergefell decision supplants the democratic process with the views of five unelected justices.
“If a bare majority of justices can invent a new right and impose that right on the rest of the country, the only real limit on what future majorities will be able to do is their own sense of what those with political power and cultural influence are willing to tolerate,” Alito had written in his dissent.
“All Americans, whatever their thinking on that issue,” he concluded, “should worry about what the majority’s claim of power portends.”
Alito was a U.S. Attorney in New Jersey and based in Newark while a member of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. He was nominated to the High Court by President George W. Bush and has served since 2006.
Article taken from LifeSiteNews